Matter of Adirondack Mountain Reserve v. Bd. of Assessors of the Town of N. Hudson

475 N.E.2d 115, 64 N.Y.2d 727, 485 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4897
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 20, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 475 N.E.2d 115 (Matter of Adirondack Mountain Reserve v. Bd. of Assessors of the Town of N. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Adirondack Mountain Reserve v. Bd. of Assessors of the Town of N. Hudson, 475 N.E.2d 115, 64 N.Y.2d 727, 485 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4897 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeal taken as of right should be dismissed, without costs, upon the grounds that (1) no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous affirmance by the Appellate Division with respect to unconsolidated proceeding No. 1 (CPLR 5601), and (2) the dissent with respect to proceeding No. 2 is not on a question of law (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [i]). On the court’s own motion leave to appeal is granted to petitioner and the order of the Appellate Division is affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner instituted these proceedings pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law to review assessments on its real property in Essex County. It contends that the assessments should have been reduced because in 1978 it conveyed over 9,000 of the approximately 16,000 acres it owned to the State and granted the State a conservation easement burdening the retained lands. There is support in the record for the trial court’s finding, affirmed by the Appellate Division (99 AD2d 600), that the easement did not diminish the highest and best use of petitioner’s retained property. There are also affirmed factual findings as to the value of the property on the taxable status date. The matter is therefore beyond the scope of our review.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

Appeal taken as of right dismissed, without costs. On the court’s own motion, leave to appeal granted to petitioner. Order affirmed, with costs, in memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of First United Methodist Church in Flushing v. Assessor, Town of Callicoon
2025 NY Slip Op 06526 (New York Court of Appeals, 2025)
Matter of Lost Lake Resort, Inc. v. Board of Assessors for the Town of Forestburgh
201 N.Y.S.3d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Peaceful Val. Land Stewardship, LLC v. Johnson
132 A.D.3d 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Gran Development, LLC v. Town of Davenport Board of Assessors
124 A.D.3d 1042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Gordon v. Town of Esopus
59 A.D.3d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Corvetti v. Winchell
51 A.D.3d 47 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Gibson v. Gleason
20 A.D.3d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Bialystock & Bloom v. Gleason
290 A.D.2d 607 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Blumberg v. Sherman
185 Misc. 2d 402 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)
DuPont Ross v. Town of Santa Clara
266 A.D.2d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Stillwell Equipment Corp. v. Assessors
251 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Fistraw-Del Holding Corp. v. Assessor for Town of Colonie
235 A.D.2d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Eanniello v. Morris
234 A.D.2d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Stock v. Baumgarten
211 A.D.2d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Zappala v. Hann
198 A.D.2d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Welch Foods Inc. v. Town of Portland
187 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
State v. Town of Thurman
183 A.D.2d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Fusco v. Assessor of the City of Utica
178 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Makoroff v. City of Lockport, New York
916 F.2d 890 (Third Circuit, 1990)
Spiegel v. Board of Assessors
161 A.D.2d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 N.E.2d 115, 64 N.Y.2d 727, 485 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-adirondack-mountain-reserve-v-bd-of-assessors-of-the-town-of-n-ny-1984.