Matter of Adams v. Annucci

2021 NY Slip Op 03899, 145 N.Y.S.3d 874, 195 A.D.3d 1298
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 17, 2021
Docket532616
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03899 (Matter of Adams v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Adams v. Annucci, 2021 NY Slip Op 03899, 145 N.Y.S.3d 874, 195 A.D.3d 1298 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Matter of Adams v Annucci (2021 NY Slip Op 03899)
Matter of Adams v Annucci
2021 NY Slip Op 03899
Decided on June 17, 2021
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:June 17, 2021

532616

[*1]In the Matter of Anthony Adams, Petitioner,

v

Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.


Calendar Date:May 7, 2021
Before:Garry, P.J., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ.

Anthony Adams, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record, and that the mandatory $5 surcharge was never deducted from petitioner's inmate account. Petitioner has accordingly received all the relief to which he is entitled and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Shepherd v Annucci, 193 AD3d 1134, 1134 [2021]; Matter of Vilella v Annucci, 185 AD3d 1362, 1362 [2020]).

Garry, P.J., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 03899, 145 N.Y.S.3d 874, 195 A.D.3d 1298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-adams-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2021.