Matter of A.C.W. (E.Y.W.)

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 16, 2026
DocketIndex No. 500017/21|Appeal No. 6383 M-01163|Case No. 2024-06290|
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of Matter of A.C.W. (E.Y.W.) (Matter of A.C.W. (E.Y.W.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of A.C.W. (E.Y.W.), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Matter of A.C.W. (E.Y.W.) - 2026 NY Slip Op 02339

skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Court Decisions Resources About

Matter of A.C.W. (E.Y.W.)

2026 NY Slip Op 02339

April 16, 2026

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

In the Matter of A.C.W., Petitioner-Appellant, For the Appointment of Guardian of E.Y.W., An Incapacitated Person, Allied Community Support Services, Inc., Respondent-Respondent.

Decided and Entered: April 16, 2026

Index No. 500017/21|Appeal No. 6383 M-01163|Case No. 2024-06290|

Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Rodriguez, Michael, JJ.

A.C.W., New York, appellant pro se.

Barker Patterson Nichols, LLP, Valhalla (Adonaid C. Medina of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phaedra Perry-Bond, J.), entered on or about August 15, 2024, which denied petitioner's motion to remove Allied Community Support Services as successor guardian of the person and property of the Incapacitated Person (IP), to reappoint her as successor guardian, and to transfer the IP back to the community, unanimously deemed withdrawn, without costs, upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated January 14, 2026, in which petitioner agreed to withdraw the instant appeal by January 16, 2026.

The so-ordered stipulation in which petitioner agreed to withdraw the appeal was definite and complete upon its face and constituted a valid and binding contract that should be enforced as written. Thus, there is no good cause to set aside the agreement to withdraw (see Barclay v Citibank, N.A., 136 AD3d 551, 551 [1st Dept 2016], lv dismissed 27 NY3d 1077 [2016]).

M-01163 — In the Matter of A.W.

Motion to deem petitioner's appeal withdrawn, granted.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 16, 2026

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI