Matteo v. City of New York
This text of 249 A.D. 860 (Matteo v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action for damages, based on both negligence and nuisance. Plaintiff claimed that the defendant had improperly failed to remove from the roadway of a public street an abandoned automobile and that as a consequence there was an explosion in the course of which plaintiff's intestate received burns from which he died. Judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of the defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 860, 294 N.Y.S. 348, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matteo-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1937.