Matt Nasuti v. Adrian Holm

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-3537 ___________________________

Matt Nasuti

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Adrian Holm; Judith Johnson Mekota; Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Medical Associates Clinic, PC; Does, 1-30

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern ____________

Submitted: April 28, 2023 Filed: May 4, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. This appeal follows the district court’s1 dismissal of Matt Nasuti’s removed pro se action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Montin v. Moore, 846 F.3d 289, 292 (8th Cir. 2017) (de novo review of Rule 12(b) dismissal). We deny Nasuti’s appellate request to enjoin the operation of 38 C.F.R. § 17.107.

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

-2-