Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United States Treasury Department

485 F.2d 1402, 60 C.C.P.A. 85, 1973 CCPA LEXIS 432
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedFebruary 1, 1973
DocketNo. 5496, C.A.D. 1086
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 485 F.2d 1402 (Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United States Treasury Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United States Treasury Department, 485 F.2d 1402, 60 C.C.P.A. 85, 1973 CCPA LEXIS 432 (ccpa 1973).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from the order and accompanying memorandum of the United States Customs Court, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States Treasury Department, 67 Cust. Ct. 328, C.D. 4292 (1971), granting appellees’ motion to quash and dismiss a summons and civil action on the ground that the jurisdiction of the Customs Court had not been properly invoked. The civil action was commenced by a “Petition for Mandatory, Injunctive and Other Belief,” filed in the Customs Court requesting an order of that court vacating all determinations and findings in the antidumping proceeding entitled Television Receiving Sets, Monochrome and Color, From Japan (ATS 643.3; AA1921-66), dismissing the proceeding, enjoining appellees from taking any further action in connection therewith, and declaring the invalidity and unconstitutional nature of the proceeding, vacating the dumping determination, and requiring appellees to conduct the proceeding in a manner requested. The proceedings conducted by the Bureau of Customs and the Tariff Commission culminated in a finding by the Secretary of the Treasury that the television sets are being, or are likely to be, sold at less than fair value within the meaning of section 201(a) of the Antidumping Act of 1921, as amended, thus making the sets subject to dumping duties. However, no such dumping duties have been levied, and accordingly no protest [86]*86has been filed or denied. The claim for jurisdiction of the Customs ■Court was made under the All Writs Act, 28 USC 1651.

We have considered the order and accompanying memorandum of ¡the Customs Court and find ourselves in agreement therewith.

The order of the Customs Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. The United States
880 F.2d 401 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
513 F. Supp. 1100 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Alberta Gas Chemicals, Inc. v. United States
84 Cust. Ct. 217 (U.S. Customs Court, 1980)
Alberta Gas Chemicals, Inc. v. Blumenthal
467 F. Supp. 1245 (U.S. Customs Court, 1979)
Flintkote Co. v. Blumenthal
596 F.2d 51 (Second Circuit, 1979)
Flintkote Company v. W. Michael Blumenthal
596 F.2d 51 (Second Circuit, 1979)
Flintkote Co. v. United States
82 Cust. Ct. 305 (U.S. Customs Court, 1979)
Flintkote Co. v. Blumenthal
469 F. Supp. 115 (N.D. New York, 1979)
SCM Corp. v. United States
435 F. Supp. 1224 (U.S. Customs Court, 1977)
Dexter v. United States
424 F. Supp. 1069 (U.S. Customs Court, 1977)
United States v. Boe
543 F.2d 151 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1976)
Duffy v. Tegtmeyer
489 F.2d 745 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
485 F.2d 1402, 60 C.C.P.A. 85, 1973 CCPA LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matsushita-electric-industrial-co-v-united-states-treasury-department-ccpa-1973.