Matsumura v. Smart LLC

100 A.D.3d 524, 953 N.Y.S.2d 857

This text of 100 A.D.3d 524 (Matsumura v. Smart LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matsumura v. Smart LLC, 100 A.D.3d 524, 953 N.Y.S.2d 857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered on or about March 23, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

The emails that are plaintiffs sole support for his contention that he was employed by defendants pursuant to a five-year contract fail to establish a contract for a fixed period of time (see TSR Consulting Servs. v Steinhouse, 267 AD2d 25 [1st Dept 1999]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

TSR Consulting Services, Inc. v. Steinhouse
267 A.D.2d 25 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.3d 524, 953 N.Y.S.2d 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matsumura-v-smart-llc-nyappdiv-2012.