Matsumoto v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Matsumoto v. United States

237 F. 1017, 150 C.C.A. 666, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2030

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 1916

DocketNo. 2782

StatusPublished

This text of 237 F. 1017 (Matsumoto v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matsumoto v. United States, 237 F. 1017, 150 C.C.A. 666, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2030 (9th Cir. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There being no appearance in open court of counsel for ■either party, and it appearing to the court that the record herein has not been [1018]*1018printed as required by rule 23 of the rules of practice of this court (231 Fed. v, 144 C. C. A. v), and it further appearing to the court that as the counsel for the appellant has failed to file with clerk of this court at least fifteen days before the case was called for argument, as required by rule 24 (231 Fed. v, 144 C. C. A. v), and that according to said rule appellant is in default, and that as prescribed by section 5 thereof the case may be dismissed, on consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the said appeal in this cause be and hereby is dismissed for the noncompliance by the appellant with the provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the rules of practice of this court. . .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There being no appearance in open court of counsel for ■either party, and it appearing to the court that the record herein has not been [1018]*1018printed as required by rule 23 of the rules of practice of this court (231 Fed. v, 144 C. C. A. v), and it further appearing to the court that as the counsel for the appellant has failed to file with clerk of this court at least fifteen days before the case was called for argument, as required by rule 24 (231 Fed. v, 144 C. C. A. v), and that according to said rule appellant is in default, and that as prescribed by section 5 thereof the case may be dismissed, on consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the said appeal in this cause be and hereby is dismissed for the noncompliance by the appellant with the provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the rules of practice of this court. . .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 F. 1017, 150 C.C.A. 666, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matsumoto-v-united-states-ca9-1916.