Matson v. Retriever Towing, Inc.
This text of 635 P.2d 409 (Matson v. Retriever Towing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action for conversion. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff had failed to prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence.
The record on appeal includes a tape cassett audio record. Plaintiff’s brief when referring to or reciting evidence fails to make reference to the location of the evidence in the audio record. That violates Rule 25.15, Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rules of Appellate Procedure. We will not search the tape.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
635 P.2d 409, 54 Or. App. 558, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matson-v-retriever-towing-inc-orctapp-1981.