Matson v. Connelly

Illinois Supreme Court

Matson v. Connelly

24 Ill. 142

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 24 Ill. 142 (Matson v. Connelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matson v. Connelly, 24 Ill. 142 (Ill. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Beeese, J.

There was no necessity for amending this verdict in the court below. The defect is cured by our statute of amendments and jeofails.

Error having been joined, the motion to dismiss the appeal comes too late. It would have prevailed if made in the first instance, as the judgment does not amount to twenty dollars, exclusive of costs, nor does it relate to a franchise or freehold.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beeese, J.

There was no necessity for amending this verdict in the court below. The defect is cured by our statute of amendments and jeofails.

Error having been joined, the motion to dismiss the appeal comes too late. It would have prevailed if made in the first instance, as the judgment does not amount to twenty dollars, exclusive of costs, nor does it relate to a franchise or freehold.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Ill. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matson-v-connelly-ill-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack