Matrix v. TAG Investments

2002 ND 119
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided July 16, 2002·No. 20020026·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Filed 7/16/02 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2002 ND 120

Mark Lithun and Marie Lithun, Petitioners and Appellees

v.

Michael O. DuPaul, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20020008

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable William W. McLees, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Leslie Bakken Oliver, Vogel Law Firm, P.O. Box 2097, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2097, for petitioners and appellees.

Michael O. DuPaul, pro se, Box 932, Minot, N.D. 58702.

Lithun v. DuPaul

[¶1] Michael O. DuPaul appealed from a district court order granting Mark and Marie Lithuns’ petition for a disorderly conduct restraining order under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31.2-01.  We affirm the order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Dale V. Sandstrom

Georgia Dawson, D.J.

[¶3] The Honorable Georgia Dawson, D.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matrix v. TAG Investments, 2002 ND 119 (N.D. 2002).

2002 ND 119 (Matrix v. TAG Investments) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lithun v. DuPaul
2002 ND 120 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2002)