Matrix v. TAG Investments
This text of 2002 ND 119 (Matrix v. TAG Investments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 7/16/02 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2002 ND 120
Mark Lithun and Marie Lithun, Petitioners and Appellees
v.
Michael O. DuPaul, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20020008
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable William W. McLees, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Leslie Bakken Oliver, Vogel Law Firm, P.O. Box 2097, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2097, for petitioners and appellees.
Michael O. DuPaul, pro se, Box 932, Minot, N.D. 58702.
Lithun v. DuPaul
[¶1] Michael O. DuPaul appealed from a district court order granting Mark and Marie Lithuns’ petition for a disorderly conduct restraining order under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31.2-01. We affirm the order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Dale V. Sandstrom
Georgia Dawson, D.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Georgia Dawson, D.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2002 ND 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matrix-v-tag-investments-nd-2002.