Matrisciano v. City of New York
This text of 281 A.D. 1046 (Matrisciano v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon an application under subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, it appears that the notice of claim was served by registered mail ninety-three days after the claim arose and that the late service was not due to any incapacity of the claimant or other reason which is a ground for the exercise of diseeretion in permitting late service. It appears further that the appellant acknowledged receipt of the notice and thereafter examined the claimant. The City of New York appeals from an order permitting the late service and directing the city’s comptroller to accept such service. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. The court is without discretion to allow late service for any reason other than those stated in the statute., Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 1046, 121 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matrisciano-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1953.