Matra Americas, LLC v. United States
Opinion
Slip Op. 25-
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
MATRA AMERICAS, LLC and MATRA ATLANTIC GmbH,
Plaintiffs,
and
KOEHLER PAPER SE and KOEHLER OBERKIRCH GmbH,
Plaintiff-Intervenors, Before: Gary S. Katzmann, Judge v. Consol. Court No. 21-00632
UNITED STATES, Defendant,
and APPVION, LLC and DOMTAR CORP., Defendant-Intervenors.
JUDGMENT
Following remand, the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) submitted the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Aug. 29, 2025, ECF No. 99 (“Remand Results”). On September 29, 2025, Appvion LLC and Domtar Corporation filed comments objecting to Commerce’s decision on remand, arguing that interest expenses from unpaid duties “should have been reclassified as U.S. indirect selling expenses . . . to be deducted from [constructed export price].” Comments of Plaintiffs Domtar Corporation and Appvion, LLC in Opposition to Commerce’s Remand Determination at 2, Sep. 29, 2025, ECF No. 104. Upon this court’s issuance of an opinion in Domtar Corp. v. United States, 49 CIT __, 2025 WL 2888003
Consol. Court No. 21-00632 Page 2
(Oct. 10, 2025) holding that Commerce’s determination that accrued interest from unpaid duties is not an indirect selling expense is supported by substantial evidence and in accordance with law, Appvion LLC and Domtar Corporation agreed to withdraw their objections. See Joint Status Report, Nov. 17, 2025, ECF No. 108. All parties now agree that the court should sustain Commerce’s final remand results. See id. Accordingly, and pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that Commerce’s Remand Results in this action are sustained.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Gary S. Katzmann
Gary S. Katzmann, Judge
Dated: November 20, 2025 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2025 CIT 145 (Matra Americas, LLC v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.