Matos v. State
200 So. 3d 104, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18483, 2015 WL 8483866
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Matos v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19541 →
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order denying Michael Matos’ post-conviction motion, except as to grounds 7 and 13. As the State properly concedes, as to those two grounds, the trial court erred in failing to attach exhibits which conclusively refute the allegations set forth therein. Accordingly, as to those two grounds, we reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach documents conclusively refuting those grounds or to hold an evidentiary hearing thereon.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matos v. State, 200 So. 3d 104, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18483, 2015 WL 8483866 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
200 So. 3d 104 (Matos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.