Matos v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matos v. New York City Housing Authority

24 A.D.2d 882, 264 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3017

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1965·Published

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to compel the respondent to hold a hearing on petitioner’s claim to recover damages for personal injury, the respondent appeals from a judgment (denominated as an order) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 13, 1964, which directed such hearing. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and proceeding dismissed. Relief in the nature of mandamus may not be granted under the circumstances here presented (Matter of McSweeney v. Reid, 37 Misc 2d 646). Hghetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to compel the respondent to hold a hearing on petitioner’s claim to recover damages for personal injury, the respondent appeals from a judgment (denominated as an order) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 13, 1964, which directed such hearing. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and proceeding dismissed. Relief in the nature of mandamus may not be granted under the circumstances here presented (Matter of McSweeney v. Reid, 37 Misc 2d 646). Hghetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Matos v. New York City Housing Authority, 24 A.D.2d 882, 264 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

24 A.D.2d 882 (Matos v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related