Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Matos v. New York City Housing Authority

Matos v. New York City Housing Authority

24 A.D.2d 882, 264 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3017
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1965
StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 882 (Matos v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matos v. New York City Housing Authority, 24 A.D.2d 882, 264 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to compel the respondent to hold a hearing on petitioner’s claim to recover damages for personal injury, the respondent appeals from a judgment (denominated as an order) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 13, 1964, which directed such hearing. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and proceeding dismissed. Relief in the nature of mandamus may not be granted under the circumstances here presented (Matter of McSweeney v. Reid, 37 Misc 2d 646). Hghetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McSweeney v. Reid
37 Misc. 2d 646 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 882, 264 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matos-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1965.