Matos v. Goord

271 A.D.2d 767, 706 N.Y.S.2d 744, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4229
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 13, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 271 A.D.2d 767 (Matos v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matos v. Goord, 271 A.D.2d 767, 706 N.Y.S.2d 744, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of a temporary release violation based upon a misbehavior report and petitioner’s plea of guilty. Initially, we note that petitioner’s guilty plea to the charged violation precludes him from challenging respondent’s determination on substantial evidence grounds (see, Matter of Talbot v Goord, 257 AD2d 954).

We also reject petitioner’s assertion that the determination must be annulled due to a minor time discrepancy on the misbehavior report. Preliminarily, we note that the record reveals that petitioner was aware of the time discrepancy on the misbehavior report at the time he entered his plea and nonetheless elected to proceed. In any event, the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to provide notice of the charges and to enable petitioner to prepare a defense (see, Matter of Rosario v Selsky, 266 AD2d 656, 657). Petitioner’s remaining arguments, to the extent that they have been preserved for our review, are found to be lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

La Tour v. New York State Department of Correctional Services Central Office Review Committee
5 A.D.3d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Claudio v. Selsky
273 A.D.2d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Goodson v. Murphy
273 A.D.2d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 767, 706 N.Y.S.2d 744, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matos-v-goord-nyappdiv-2000.