Matos v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

35 A.3d 1214, 613 Pa. 598, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 180
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 25, 2012
DocketNo. 125 EM 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 35 A.3d 1214 (Matos v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matos v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, 35 A.3d 1214, 613 Pa. 598, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 180 (Pa. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED. To the extent the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief requests extraordinary relief, it is DENIED. To the extent the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief requests mandamus relief, it is GRANTED. The Post Conviction Relief Act court is directed to provide Petitioner with court-appointed counsel, if warranted, within 60 days of this order. Additionally, the lower court is directed to dispose of the pending petition expeditiously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 A.3d 1214, 613 Pa. 598, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matos-v-court-of-common-pleas-of-philadelphia-county-pa-2012.