Matone v. Sycamore Realty Corp.

50 A.D.3d 978, 858 N.Y.S.2d 202
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 22, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 50 A.D.3d 978 (Matone v. Sycamore Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matone v. Sycamore Realty Corp., 50 A.D.3d 978, 858 N.Y.S.2d 202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to set aside a deed, the defendant Sycamore Realty Corp. appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated February 16, 2007, which granted the plaintiffs’ renewed motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 (a) for leave to enter judgment against it upon its default in appearing or answering, and to set aside the subject deed.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On its renewed motion, the plaintiffs demonstrated their entitlement to the entry of a default judgment against the appellant. The plaintiffs submitted proof of service of the summons and complaint, proof of the facts constituting their claim, and proof of the appellant’s default in answering or appearing (see CPLR 3215 [f]; Allstate Ins. Co. v Austin, 48 AD3d 720 [2008]; Grinage v City of New York, 45 AD3d 729 [2007]).

To avoid the entry of a default judgment, the appellant was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default and a meritorious defense to the action (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Petersen v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, P.C., 47 AD3d 783 [2008]; Giovanelli v Rivera, 23 AD3d 616 [2005]). The appellant failed to satisfy either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ renewed motion. Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Covello, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur. (See 14 Misc 3d 1217(A), 2007 NY Slip Op 50061(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Medas v. Rochpark Realty, LLC
2017 NY Slip Op 4265 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Jing Shan Chen v. R & K 51 Realty, Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 1541 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Sycamore Realty Corp. v. Matone
94 A.D.3d 1090 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Kolonkowski v. Daily News, L.P.
94 A.D.3d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Atlantic Casualty Insurance v. RJNJ Services, Inc.
89 A.D.3d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Church of South India Malayalam Congregation v. Bryant Installations, Inc.
85 A.D.3d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Miterko v. Peaslee
80 A.D.3d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Triangle Properties 2, LLC v. Narang
73 A.D.3d 1030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Mercury Casualty Co. v. Surgical Center at Milburn, LLC
65 A.D.3d 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.3d 978, 858 N.Y.S.2d 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matone-v-sycamore-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2008.