Matone v. Furst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matone v. Furst

21 A.D.2d 970, 252 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3192

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 18, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 970 (Matone v. Furst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matone v. Furst, 21 A.D.2d 970, 252 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to enjoin the respondents, as Commissioners of Elections constituting the Board of Elections of Rockland County, from altering, dividing, splitting- or otherwise creating any additional districts out of Election District No. 2 in the Town of Haverstraw in said county, pursuant to statute (Election Law, § 64, subd. 6), by reason of an allegedly excessive number of voters in said district, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County, dated September 15, 1964, which denied their motion for; an injunction pendente lite. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to enjoin the respondents, as Commissioners of Elections constituting the Board of Elections of Rockland County, from altering, dividing, splitting- or otherwise creating any additional districts out of Election District No. 2 in the Town of Haverstraw in said county, pursuant to statute (Election Law, § 64, subd. 6), by reason of an allegedly excessive number of voters in said district, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County, dated September 15, 1964, which denied their motion for; an injunction pendente lite. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 970, 252 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matone-v-furst-nyappdiv-1964.