Matney v. Herod

Missouri Court of Appeals

Matney v. Herod

247 S.W.3d 76, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 293, 2008 WL 564963

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 4, 2008

DocketWD 68391

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 S.W.3d 76 (Matney v. Herod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matney v. Herod, 247 S.W.3d 76, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 293, 2008 WL 564963 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tara Matney appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission dismissing her appeal from her disqualification from unemployment benefits because she did not participate in the telephone hearing before the appeals tribunal. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tara Matney appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission dismissing her appeal from her disqualification from unemployment benefits because she did not participate in the telephone hearing before the appeals tribunal. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 S.W.3d 76, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 293, 2008 WL 564963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matney-v-herod-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack