Matlock v. Taylor

14 Ind. 576
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 23, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ind. 576 (Matlock v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matlock v. Taylor, 14 Ind. 576 (Ind. 1860).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit on notes and to foreclose a mortgage. Judgment by default for plaintiff.

J. L. Ketcham, C. C. Nave, and J. Witherow, for the appellants. C. T. Patten, for the appellee.

Two points are presented; first, that the Court erred in setting aside a judgment by default rendered against the plaintiff; and, second, in rendering the judgment in the form in which it is entered against the appellants.

The appellants, so far as the record shows, made no motion in the Court below in reference to the judgment taken against them by default. Harlan v. Edwards, 13 Ind. R. 430. But we have looked into the record and see no error.

The judgment is affirmed with 5 per.cent. damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Ind. 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matlock-v-taylor-ind-1860.