Matlock Truck Body and Trailer Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

454 F.2d 1172, 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2654, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11095
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 25, 1972·No. 71-1559·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of a petition to review and set aside certain findings and orders of the National Labor Relations Board, see 191 N.L.R.B: No. 91 (1971), and a cross-petition to enforce said orders filed by the Board; and after full consideration of the briefs and the appendix filed in this proceeding, and finding substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole for affirmance of the Board’s finding that petitioner had violated Section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1) (1970), by coercive interrogations and threats, and that there is substantial evidence on the whole record that petitioner also violated §'8(a) (1) (3) and (4) of the Act by discharging three employees because of their protected concerted activities.

The orders of the National Labor Relations Board are enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matlock Truck Body and Trailer Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 454 F.2d 1172, 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2654, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11095 (6th Cir. 1972).

454 F.2d 1172 (Matlock Truck Body and Trailer Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1)