Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Matisko v. Matisko

Matisko v. Matisko

834 So. 2d 405, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 289, 2003 WL 131628
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 17, 2003
DocketNo. 5D02-1238
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 834 So. 2d 405 (Matisko v. Matisko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matisko v. Matisko, 834 So. 2d 405, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 289, 2003 WL 131628 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Husband has failed to demonstrate any error in the rulings made by the trial court. Specifically, husband has failed to show that it was error to award wife all of the marital home, which was hers by inheritance, as her separate property. Nor did the trial court err in excluding certain evidence as irrelevant to the issues in the case. Finally, the husband’s failure to obtain a ruling on his motion for sanctions precludes consideration on appeal of whether the motion should have been granted.

SHARP, W„ GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reed v. Reed
857 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
834 So. 2d 405, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 289, 2003 WL 131628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matisko-v-matisko-fladistctapp-2003.