Matisko v. Matisko
834 So. 2d 405, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 289, 2003 WL 131628
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 2003·No. No. 5D02-1238·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
AFFIRMED.
Husband has failed to demonstrate any error in the rulings made by the trial court. Specifically, husband has failed to show that it was error to award wife all of the marital home, which was hers by inheritance, as her separate property. Nor did the trial court err in excluding certain evidence as irrelevant to the issues in the case. Finally, the husband’s failure to obtain a ruling on his motion for sanctions precludes consideration on appeal of whether the motion should have been granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matisko v. Matisko, 834 So. 2d 405, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 289, 2003 WL 131628 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
834 So. 2d 405 (Matisko v. Matisko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reed v. Reed
857 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)