Mathurin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mathurin v. State

69 So. 3d 1121, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15384, 2011 WL 4467383

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 28, 2011

Docket4D10-3121

StatusPublished

This text of 69 So. 3d 1121 (Mathurin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mathurin v. State, 69 So. 3d 1121, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15384, 2011 WL 4467383 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his judgment and sentence following his no contest plea to possession of cocaine with intent to deliver or sell. He argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. The State has filed a Concession of Error because the Supreme Court of Florida has now disapproved of State v. Laveroni, 910 So.2d 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), upon which the trial court relied in denying the motion. See Harris v. State, 71 So.3d 756, 2011 WL 1496470 (Fla.2011).

We accept the Concession of Error, reverse the judgment and sentence, and remand the case to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and Remanded.

MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI