Mathivathani Mohan v. Rathnasabapathy Mohan - Dissenting
This text of Mathivathani Mohan v. Rathnasabapathy Mohan - Dissenting (Mathivathani Mohan v. Rathnasabapathy Mohan - Dissenting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
FILED October 9, 1998
MATHIVATHANI MOHAN, ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9708-CV-00415 ) VS. ) Davidson Circuit ) No. 96D-373 ) RATHNASABAPATHY MOHAN, ) ) Defendant/Appellant. )
DISSENTING OPINION
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because I do not think the
trial judge abused her discretion in denying the appellant’s motion for a new trial. The
appellant’s motion does not set out what proof he would offer at a new trial and how
that might change the result below. Therefore, I think the trial judge justifiably
overruled the motion.
_________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mathivathani Mohan v. Rathnasabapathy Mohan - Dissenting, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathivathani-mohan-v-rathnasabapathy-mohan-dissent-tennctapp-1998.