Mathivathani Mohan v. Rathnasabapathy Mohan - Dissenting

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided October 9, 1998·No. 01A01-9708-CV-00415·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

FILED October 9, 1998

MATHIVATHANI MOHAN, ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9708-CV-00415 ) VS. ) Davidson Circuit ) No. 96D-373 ) RATHNASABAPATHY MOHAN, ) ) Defendant/Appellant. )

DISSENTING OPINION

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because I do not think the

trial judge abused her discretion in denying the appellant’s motion for a new trial. The

appellant’s motion does not set out what proof he would offer at a new trial and how

that might change the result below. Therefore, I think the trial judge justifiably

overruled the motion.

_________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathivathani Mohan v. Rathnasabapathy Mohan - Dissenting, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Mathivathani Mohan v. Rathnasabapathy Mohan - Dissenting (Mathivathani Mohan v. Rathnasabapathy Mohan - Dissenting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.