Mathison v. United States

694 F. App'x 444

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: July 26, 2017
• Docket: No. 16-4285, No. 16-4286
• Status: Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM. '

In these consolidated cases, Eugene Ma-thison appeals following the district court’s¹ denial of his petitions for coram nobis relief. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court properly denied relief. See United States v. Camacho-Bordes, 94 F.3d 1168, 1173 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review; coram nobis writ should be granted only under circumstances compelling such action to achieve justice and to correct errors of most fundamental character); Azzone v. United States, 341 F.2d 417, 419-20 (8th Cir. 1966) (per curiam) (coram nobis petitioner not entitled to review of issues that were considered and resolved either on direct appeal or in 28 U.S.C. § 2256 motion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 . The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.