Mathison v. Seymour

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Mathison v. Seymour

194 N.W.2d 766, 292 Minn. 474, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1347

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 4, 1972

DocketNo. 42504

StatusPublished

This text of 194 N.W.2d 766 (Mathison v. Seymour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mathison v. Seymour, 194 N.W.2d 766, 292 Minn. 474, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1347 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case arises from supplementary proceedings in receivership wherein the district court disallowed appellant’s final account as receiver. He contends that the findings of fact and conclusions of law are not supported by the evidence.

We have examined the record and it does not appear that the lower court’s ruling was clearly erroneous. Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Todd, not having been a member of this court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case arises from supplementary proceedings in receivership wherein the district court disallowed appellant’s final account as receiver. He contends that the findings of fact and conclusions of law are not supported by the evidence.

We have examined the record and it does not appear that the lower court’s ruling was clearly erroneous. Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Todd, not having been a member of this court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 N.W.2d 766, 292 Minn. 474, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathison-v-seymour-minn-1972.