Mathison v. Seymour

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Mathison v. Seymour

194 N.W.2d 766, 292 Minn. 474, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1347

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 4, 1972·No. No. 42504·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case arises from supplementary proceedings in receivership wherein the district court disallowed appellant’s final account as receiver. He contends that the findings of fact and conclusions of law are not supported by the evidence.

We have examined the record and it does not appear that the lower court’s ruling was clearly erroneous. Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Todd, not having been a member of this court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case arises from supplementary proceedings in receivership wherein the district court disallowed appellant’s final account as receiver. He contends that the findings of fact and conclusions of law are not supported by the evidence.

We have examined the record and it does not appear that the lower court’s ruling was clearly erroneous. Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Todd, not having been a member of this court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Mathison v. Seymour, 194 N.W.2d 766, 292 Minn. 474, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1347 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

194 N.W.2d 766 (Mathison v. Seymour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.