Mathis v. Zurich American Insurance

127 A.D.3d 622, 5 N.Y.S.3d 872
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 2015·No. 14939·Published

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), entered March 11, 2014, awarding plaintiff a sum of money, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment denied, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff failed to comply with the insurance policy’s notice of lawsuit requirement, a condition precedent to coverage (see Argo Corp. v Greater N.Y. Mut. Ins. Co., 4 NY3d 332 [2005]).

The restrictions of Insurance Law § 3420 (d) do not apply to this policy, which was not issued or delivered in the State of New York (see generally FC Bruckner Assoc., L.P. v Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 95 AD3d 556 [1st Dept 2012]). In any event, the insurer’s disclaimer was timely.

Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Renwick and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathis v. Zurich American Insurance, 127 A.D.3d 622, 5 N.Y.S.3d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

127 A.D.3d 622 (Mathis v. Zurich American Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Argo Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual Insurance
827 N.E.2d 762 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
FC Bruckner Associates v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
95 A.D.3d 556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)