Mathis v. Stephens
Opinion
Dontae Mathis, Case No.: 2:23-cv-0892-JAD-BNW
Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and v. Recommendation and Dismissing Case
Robert Stephens, et al., [ECF No. 3]
Defendants
The magistrate judge has screened Plaintiff Dontae Mathis’s complaint against Assistant District Attorney Robert Stephens and District Judge Monica Trujillo, found that both are immune from this suit, and recommends that this case be dismissed and closed without prejudice to Mathis’s ability to pursue habeas relief for the conduct he alleges.1 The deadline for Mathis to object to that recommendation passed without objection or request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”2 Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This case is DISMISSED without . . . 1 ECF No. 3. 2 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 1} leave to amend, and the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. ° “Dees U.S. Distrtet_Iudge Jennifer A. Dorsey Dated: October 4, 2023 5 6 7 8 9 1]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathis v. Stephens (Mathis v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.