Mathis v. State

18 S.W.2d 920, 113 Tex. Crim. 164, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 576
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 22, 1929
DocketNo. 12591.
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 18 S.W.2d 920 (Mathis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathis v. State, 18 S.W.2d 920, 113 Tex. Crim. 164, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 576 (Tex. 1929).

Opinions

The offense is swindling, a misdemeanor; the punishment a fine of $75.00 and confinement in jail for thirty days.

It appears from the record that the term of court at which appellant was tried ended on the 22nd day of December, 1928. No notice of appeal appears to have been given or entered of record during said term of court. The only notice of appeal of record appears to have been given and entered of record on the 1st day of January, 1929, approximately eight days after the adjournment of the term at which appellant was tried. Article 827 C. C. P., among other things, provides that an appeal is taken "by giving notice thereof in open court at the term of court at which conviction is had, and having the same entered of record." Article 826 C. C. P. provides that an appeal may be taken "at any time during the term of court at which the conviction was had." Having failed to give notice of appeal during the term, appellant forfeited his right to appeal. Clark v. State, 3 Texas Appeals 338[3 Tex. Crim. 338]; Morse v. State, 47 S.W. 645; Wilcox v. State,31 Tex. 586; Offield v. State, 135 S.W. 566. This court is without jurisdiction in the absence of proper notice of appeal. Davidson v. State, 285 S.W. 831.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON MOTION TO RE-INSTATE APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhodes v. State
560 S.W.2d 665 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Donahoe v. State
285 S.W.2d 952 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Donahoo v. State
285 S.W.2d 952 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Rumfield v. State
141 S.W.2d 630 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Edmondson v. State
64 S.W.2d 795 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Whitehead v. State
35 S.W.2d 730 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Trigg v. State
34 S.W.2d 878 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Sasse v. State
22 S.W.2d 941 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Armstrong v. State
18 S.W.2d 921 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 S.W.2d 920, 113 Tex. Crim. 164, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.