Mathis v. State
This text of 194 S.W. 159 (Mathis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for resisting an officer, his punishment being assessed at a fine of twenty-five dollars.
The record shows that appellant entered into an appeal bond signed by himself and sureties, and approved by the sheriff, and filed same with the county clerk. Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney General to dismiss the appeal because appellant did not in open court enter into a recognizance as required by the statute as a means of attaching the jurisdiction of this court on appeal. The motion of the Assistant Attorney General will have to be sustained, and accordingly the appeal is dismissed.
Dism.issed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 S.W. 159, 81 Tex. Crim. 167, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-state-texcrimapp-1917.