Mathis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mathis v. State

365 S.W.3d 309, 2012 WL 1500005, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 595

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 1, 2012

DocketWD 73495

StatusPublished

This text of 365 S.W.3d 309 (Mathis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mathis v. State, 365 S.W.3d 309, 2012 WL 1500005, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 595 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

John M. Mathis appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief with respect to his convictions for voluntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. Mathis claims that his attorney provided him with ineffective assistance for failing to request a mistrial after the victim’s family intimidated numerous jurors during the sentencing phase of the trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

John M. Mathis appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief with respect to his convictions for voluntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. Mathis claims that his attorney provided him with ineffective assistance for failing to request a mistrial after the victim’s family intimidated numerous jurors during the sentencing phase of the trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 S.W.3d 309, 2012 WL 1500005, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-state-moctapp-2012.