Mathis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mathis v. State

365 S.W.3d 309, 2012 WL 1500005, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 595

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 1, 2012·No. WD 73495·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

John M. Mathis appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief with respect to his convictions for voluntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. Mathis claims that his attorney provided him with ineffective assistance for failing to request a mistrial after the victim’s family intimidated numerous jurors during the sentencing phase of the trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

John M. Mathis appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief with respect to his convictions for voluntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. Mathis claims that his attorney provided him with ineffective assistance for failing to request a mistrial after the victim’s family intimidated numerous jurors during the sentencing phase of the trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Mathis v. State, 365 S.W.3d 309, 2012 WL 1500005, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 595 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

365 S.W.3d 309 (Mathis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.