Mathis v. State
This text of 228 S.E.2d 228 (Mathis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of burglary and motor vehicle theft. Held:
1. The state’s evidence showed that defendant was arrested in a van type motor vehicle which had earlier been unlawfully taken on September 13, 1975, from [293]*293burglarized premises. Defendant testified that while hitchhiking from Atlanta to Chattanooga, Tennessee to attend a concert at which a "Rod Stewart” was a featured performer, he was given a ride in this van which was operated by an unknown third party who fled when the van was stopped by the police. In rebuttal to defendant’s testimony, and over objection, a state’s witness testified that his firm represented Rod Stewart in obtaining theatrical bookings; and that he had checked the company’s records and they revealed that Rod Stewart was booked for an engagement in Albuquerque, New Mexico on September 13, 1975, and that he had never performed in Chattanooga, Tennessee during 1975. This testimony was objected to because it violated the best evidence rule and the witness was not testifying from his own personal knowledge. This evidence was admissible for it was offered to reflect on the defendant’s credibility and it had no bearing on the issue of defendant’s guilt. A matter collateral to a main issue may be shown by parol evidence and need not be established by documentary evidence. Roberts v. State, 86 Ga. App. 768 (72 SE2d 551).
2. All other enumerations have no merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 S.E.2d 228, 139 Ga. App. 292, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-state-gactapp-1976.