Mathis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mathis v. State

211 S.E.2d 400, 133 Ga. App. 445, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1105

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 3, 1974

Docket49855

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 211 S.E.2d 400 (Mathis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mathis v. State, 211 S.E.2d 400, 133 Ga. App. 445, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1105 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

The defendant was indicted for aggravated assault. The indictment also charged that he had been previously convicted of an offense and sentenced to confinement and [446]*446labor in the penitentiary. His special demurrer to the indictment on the ground that it contained prejudicial matter relating to a prior offense was overruled. During the guilt or innocence stage of the trial, the previous conviction was admitted over objection. Held:

Argued November 4, 1974 Decided December 3, 1974. Sumner & Mitchell, Douglas W. Mitchell, III, Yancey & Perkins, Dane Perkins, for appellant. Vickers Neugent, District Attorney, W. S. Perry, for appellee.

1. It was not error to overrule the special demurrer for it is required that before recidivist punishment can be imposed, the defendant must have been indicted under the applicable recidivist statute, in this case Code Ann. § 27-2511. Tribble v. State, 168 Ga. 699 (148 SE 593). However, under our bifurcated trial procedure, it is reversible error, absent a waiver, to disclose the previous conviction during the guilt or innocence phase of the trial. Riggins v. Stynchombe, 231 Ga. 589, 592 (203 SE2d 208). We reverse for this reason.

2. It is not error for the trial court to fail to give requested instructions in the exact language requested where the court charged substantially the same principles contained in the requests. Jackson v. State, 225 Ga. 553 (170 SE2d 281).

Judgment reversed.

Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

The defendant was indicted for aggravated assault. The indictment also charged that he had been previously convicted of an offense and sentenced to confinement and [446]*446labor in the penitentiary. His special demurrer to the indictment on the ground that it contained prejudicial matter relating to a prior offense was overruled. During the guilt or innocence stage of the trial, the previous conviction was admitted over objection. Held:

Argued November 4, 1974 Decided December 3, 1974. Sumner & Mitchell, Douglas W. Mitchell, III, Yancey & Perkins, Dane Perkins, for appellant. Vickers Neugent, District Attorney, W. S. Perry, for appellee.

1. It was not error to overrule the special demurrer for it is required that before recidivist punishment can be imposed, the defendant must have been indicted under the applicable recidivist statute, in this case Code Ann. § 27-2511. Tribble v. State, 168 Ga. 699 (148 SE 593). However, under our bifurcated trial procedure, it is reversible error, absent a waiver, to disclose the previous conviction during the guilt or innocence phase of the trial. Riggins v. Stynchombe, 231 Ga. 589, 592 (203 SE2d 208). We reverse for this reason.

2. It is not error for the trial court to fail to give requested instructions in the exact language requested where the court charged substantially the same principles contained in the requests. Jackson v. State, 225 Ga. 553 (170 SE2d 281).

Judgment reversed.

Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 S.E.2d 400, 133 Ga. App. 445, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-state-gactapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack