Mathis v. State

117 S.E. 95, 30 Ga. App. 10, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 212

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 6, 1923·No. 14051·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence did not authorize the conviction in this case, and it was error for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Thomas & Walker, for plaintiff in error, W. B. Gibbs, solicitor,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathis v. State, 117 S.E. 95, 30 Ga. App. 10, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 212 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

117 S.E. 95 (Mathis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.