Mathis v. State

74 S.E. 713, 11 Ga. App. 95, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 272
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 16, 1912·No. 4079·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The description of the public road was sufficiently specific and. definite. It was necessary that the accused be apprised of the public road upon which he was accused of being intoxicated, but this requirement was complied with when he was informed that it was a public road passing the residences of two named landowners and citizens.

2. The fact that a road is a public highway may be proved in any one of four ways. Johnson v. State, 1 Ga. App. 195 (58 S. E. 265). The evidence of dedication in the present case is clear and direct, and, in addition, the circumstance that the road was worked by convicts under the direction of the county authorities is sufficient to authorize the inference that it had been formally laid out and adopted as a public road by the county authorities.

3. The evidence authorized the conviction. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathis v. State, 74 S.E. 713, 11 Ga. App. 95, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 272 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

74 S.E. 713 (Mathis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stewart v. State
171 S.E. 833 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)