Mathis v. State
580 So. 2d 892, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287, 1991 WL 103422
This text of 580 So. 2d 892 (Mathis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mathis v. State, 580 So. 2d 892, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287, 1991 WL 103422 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
Appellant appeals his conviction of burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. We affirm but remand for correction of the scrivener’s error in the written judgment and sentence indicating that appellant pled nolo contendere when, in fact, he was found guilty by a jury.
AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of the scrivener’s error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
580 So. 2d 892, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287, 1991 WL 103422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.