Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mathis v. State

Mathis v. State

580 So. 2d 892, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287, 1991 WL 103422
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mathis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1527 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 14, 1991·No. No. 90-2384·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction of burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. We affirm but remand for correction of the scrivener’s error in the written judgment and sentence indicating that appellant pled nolo contendere when, in fact, he was found guilty by a jury.

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of the scrivener’s error.

ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathis v. State, 580 So. 2d 892, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287, 1991 WL 103422 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

580 So. 2d 892 (Mathis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.