Mathis v. State

419 So. 2d 774, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21232
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 1982·No. No. AH-106·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

In this appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief made pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Mathis contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel and that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the case. We affirm.

Mathis raised the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel in a previous 3.850 motion which he failed to timely appeal, resulting in its dismissal. He is, therefore, precluded from raising this issue again.

The contention that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the case because it did not find sufficient facts to show that the crime was committed in Leon County is without merit. That argument goes not to jurisdiction, but to venue. Venue may be waived; jurisdiction may not. Lane v. State, 388 So.2d 1022 (Fla.1980). Any objection Mathis might have had to venue in Leon County was waived by his plea of guilty.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathis v. State, 419 So. 2d 774, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21232 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

419 So. 2d 774 (Mathis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
M.D. Florida, 2026
Derrick Barrett v. the State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Slattery v. State
433 So. 2d 615 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
King v. State
423 So. 2d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)