Mathis v. State
This text of 373 So. 2d 433 (Mathis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These appeals are from a revocation of probation. Appellant pled guilty to separate informations and was' granted probation with a special provision that he serve one year in the county jail. He did not surrender himself as required by the order of probation and, in fact, was out of the state. The trial court did not accept appellant’s explanation of this violation. This court may not substitute its conscience for that of the trial judge. The judgment and sentences are affirmed upon the principles set out in Bernhardt v. State, 288 So.2d 490 (Fla.1974).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
373 So. 2d 433, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.