Mathis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mathis v. State

373 So. 2d 433, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15497

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1979·No. Nos. 78-610, 79-150·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These appeals are from a revocation of probation. Appellant pled guilty to separate informations and was' granted probation with a special provision that he serve one year in the county jail. He did not surrender himself as required by the order of probation and, in fact, was out of the state. The trial court did not accept appellant’s explanation of this violation. This court may not substitute its conscience for that of the trial judge. The judgment and sentences are affirmed upon the principles set out in Bernhardt v. State, 288 So.2d 490 (Fla.1974).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These appeals are from a revocation of probation. Appellant pled guilty to separate informations and was' granted probation with a special provision that he serve one year in the county jail. He did not surrender himself as required by the order of probation and, in fact, was out of the state. The trial court did not accept appellant’s explanation of this violation. This court may not substitute its conscience for that of the trial judge. The judgment and sentences are affirmed upon the principles set out in Bernhardt v. State, 288 So.2d 490 (Fla.1974).

Affirmed.

Mathis v. State, 373 So. 2d 433, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15497 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

373 So. 2d 433 (Mathis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related