Mathis v. State
63 So. 737, 9 Ala. App. 47, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 262
Opinion
As there is no hill of exceptions in this case, the action of the court in overruling a [48] motion, which is set out in the record, made by the defendant, to quash the venire of jurors served upon him on grounds dehors the record proper is not presented for review on this appeal. — Kimbell v. State, 165 Ala. 118, 51 South. 16; Harris v. State, 4 Ala. App. 51, 58 South. 759.
No error is found in the record.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathis v. State, 63 So. 737, 9 Ala. App. 47, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 262 (Ala. Ct. App. 1913).
63 So. 737 (Mathis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris v. State
58 So. 759 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Kimbell v. State
51 So. 16 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)