Mathis v. Smith
This text of 180 S.E.2d 360 (Mathis v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus wherein the sole complaint is that the charge given on alibi in the criminal trial deprived petitioner of due process of law by placing an unwarranted burden of proof upon him, depriving him of the presumption of innocence and misleading and confusing the jury. This complaint is made for the first time in the habeas corpus petition.
There is no merit in this appeal. Shoemake v. Whitlock, 226 Ga. 771 (177 SE2d 677).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 S.E.2d 360, 227 Ga. 314, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-smith-ga-1971.