Mathis v. Smith
180 S.E.2d 360, 227 Ga. 314, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 685
Opinion
This appeal is from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus wherein the sole complaint is that the charge given on alibi in the criminal trial deprived petitioner of due process of law by placing an unwarranted burden of proof upon him, depriving him of the presumption of innocence and misleading and confusing the jury. This complaint is made for the first time in the habeas corpus petition.
There is no merit in this appeal. Shoemake v. Whitlock, 226 Ga. 771 (177 SE2d 677).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathis v. Smith, 180 S.E.2d 360, 227 Ga. 314, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 685 (Ga. 1971).
180 S.E.2d 360 (Mathis v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shoemake v. Whitlock
177 S.E.2d 677 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)