Mathis v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mathis v. Shaw

145 S.E. 465, 38 Ga. App. 783, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 453

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 17, 1928

Docket18907

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 S.E. 465 (Mathis v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mathis v. Shaw, 145 S.E. 465, 38 Ga. App. 783, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 453 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

Where two persons separately owning various articles of personalty sell them jointly for a lump sum, the sellers jointly own the debt against the buyer for the purchase-money and may bring a joint suit against him for its recovery. Bank of Oglethorpe v. Brooks, 33 Ga. App. 84 (7) (125 S. E. 600); Civil Code (1910), § 5516. Under the evidence, there was no error in directing the verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

Where two persons separately owning various articles of personalty sell them jointly for a lump sum, the sellers jointly own the debt against the buyer for the purchase-money and may bring a joint suit against him for its recovery. Bank of Oglethorpe v. Brooks, 33 Ga. App. 84 (7) (125 S. E. 600); Civil Code (1910), § 5516. Under the evidence, there was no error in directing the verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., eoneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 S.E. 465, 38 Ga. App. 783, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-shaw-gactapp-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack