Mathis v. Sears
3 N.J.L. 1043
Opinion
— The transaction is at best, a very stale one; but supposing it was ever so recent, the legal reprerentative of either party is not brought before the Court. A child, as such, cannot sue for a debt due to his father; it must be his executor or administrator. And as to Mathis, he is not even stated to bo the son, or any other way connected with Eli Mathis.
Judgment reversed.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathis v. Sears, 3 N.J.L. 1043 (N.J. 1813).
3 N.J.L. 1043 (Mathis v. Sears) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.