Mathis v. Sears
3 N.J.L. 1043
This text of 3 N.J.L. 1043 (Mathis v. Sears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mathis v. Sears, 3 N.J.L. 1043 (N.J. 1813).
Opinion
— The transaction is at best, a very stale one; but supposing it was ever so recent, the legal reprerentative of either party is not brought before the Court. A child, as such, cannot sue for a debt due to his father; it must be his executor or administrator. And as to Mathis, he is not even stated to bo the son, or any other way connected with Eli Mathis.
Judgment reversed.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-sears-nj-1813.