Mathis v. Rowland

67 S.E.2d 760, 208 Ga. 571, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 428
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 28, 1951
Docket17676
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 67 S.E.2d 760 (Mathis v. Rowland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathis v. Rowland, 67 S.E.2d 760, 208 Ga. 571, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 428 (Ga. 1951).

Opinion

Hawkins, Justice.

1. Public drunkenness, as defined by Code § 58-608, is not an offense of which, the courts of ordinary of this State have jurisdiction under the provisions of article 6, section 6, paragraph 2 of the Constitution of 1945 (Code, Ann., § 2-4102), and Code (Ann. Supp.) §§ 92A-501, 92A-502, since such an offense is not a misdemeanor case arising under the act known as the Georgia State Highway Patrol Act of 1937, or any other traffic law. Code § 58-608 is designed as a protection against a drunkard’s conduct, and not his presence. Griffin v. State, 183 Ga. 775, 779 (190 S. E. 2); Peterson v. State, 13 Ga. App. 766 (79 S. E. 927).

2. The court of ordinary being without jurisdiction of a case involving the violation of the public-drunkenness statute (Code § 58-608), a sentence imposed upon one pleading guilty to that offense in the court of ordinary is void. Clarke v. Johnson, 199 Ga. 163 (33 S. E. 2d, 425); Gibson v. Gober, 204 Ga. 714 (51 S. E. 2d, 664). Consent of parties cannot give a court jurisdiction of a subject matter when it has none by law. Smith v. Ferrario, 105 Ga. 51, 53 (31 S. E. 38); Ragan v. Standard Scale Co., 123 Ga. 14, 16 (50 S. E. 951); King v. King, 203 Ga. 811, 817 (48 S. E. 2d, 465, 2 A. L. R. 2d, 1181).

3. The court of ordinary being without jurisdiction of a case of the character above indicated, the sentence imposed by that court upon the petitioner was void, and the superior court judge erred in refusing to release the petitioner upon his habeas corpus petition attacking the sentence on that ground.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Fuller
262 S.E.2d 135 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Peoples v. State
216 S.E.2d 604 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Scarborough v. State
200 S.E.2d 115 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Turner v. McGee
125 S.E.2d 36 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Smith v. Upshaw
124 S.E.2d 751 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Dougherty County Council of Architects v. Beckanstin
110 S.E.2d 85 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.E.2d 760, 208 Ga. 571, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-rowland-ga-1951.