Mathis v. Rose
49 A. 1135, 64 N.J.L. 726, 35 Vroom 726, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 163
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mathis v. Rose. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 N.J.L. 45 →
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the-reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Van Syckel.
For affirmance — Depue (Chief Justice), Gummere,. Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vre-
DENBURGH, VOORHEES. 9.
For' reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathis v. Rose, 49 A. 1135, 64 N.J.L. 726, 35 Vroom 726, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 163 (N.J. 1900).
49 A. 1135 (Mathis v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.