Mathis v. Rose
49 A. 1135, 64 N.J.L. 726, 35 Vroom 726, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 163
This text of 49 A. 1135 (Mathis v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mathis v. Rose, 49 A. 1135, 64 N.J.L. 726, 35 Vroom 726, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 163 (N.J. 1900).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the-reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Van Syckel.
For affirmance — Depue (Chief Justice), Gummere,. Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vre-
DENBURGH, VOORHEES. 9.
For' reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 A. 1135, 64 N.J.L. 726, 35 Vroom 726, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-rose-nj-1900.