Mathis v. Nicholson

259 S.E.2d 55, 244 Ga. 106, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1133
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 5, 1979
Docket34987
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 259 S.E.2d 55 (Mathis v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathis v. Nicholson, 259 S.E.2d 55, 244 Ga. 106, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1133 (Ga. 1979).

Opinion

Jordan, Justice.

This is an appeal by the mother of two minor children from an order of the trial court denying her petition for habeas corpus and changing legal custody from her to the appellee paternal grandmother.

The trial court found "that the best interest and welfare of the minor children will be served by denying the writ of habeas corpus.” This is not the proper standard to be used in a contest between a parent and a thiid party over the custody of a child. Higbee v. Tuck, 242 Ga. 376 (249 SE2d 62) (1978). "A parent may lose the right to custody only if one of the conditions specified in Code §§ 74-108, 74-109, and 74-110 is found to exist, or, in exceptional cases, if the parent is found to be unfit. [Cits.]” White v. Bryan, 236 Ga. 349 (223 SE2d 710) (1976). A finding of unfitness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. Heath v. Martin, 225 Ga. 181 (2) (167 SE2d 153) (1969); Gazaway v. Brackett, 241 Ga. 127, 129 (244 SE2d 238) (1978).

*107 Submitted June 8, 1979 Decided September 5, 1979. F. Gregory Melton, for appellant. McCamy, Minor, Phillips & Tuggle, Joseph T. Tuggle, Jr., for appellee.

The trial court in this case did not make a finding of unfitness of the appellant mother or that she had otherwise lost her parental rights under the above stated Code sections. Since the correct standard was not used, the judgment of the trial court will be vacated with direction that a new hearing be conducted on the permanent custody of the minor children. See Childs v. Childs, 237 Ga. 177 (227 SE2d 49) (1976).

Judgment vacated and remanded with direction.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of P. M.
410 S.E.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Powell v. Orr
356 S.E.2d 562 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
In re M. M. A.
166 Ga. App. 620 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
In Re MMA
305 S.E.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Bozeman v. Williams
285 S.E.2d 9 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Miele v. Gregory
281 S.E.2d 565 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Lewis v. Lewis
280 S.E.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Carvalho v. Lewis
274 S.E.2d 471 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 S.E.2d 55, 244 Ga. 106, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-nicholson-ga-1979.