Mathis v. Holguin

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedMarch 10, 2022
Docket2:20-cv-02171
StatusUnknown

This text of Mathis v. Holguin (Mathis v. Holguin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathis v. Holguin, (D. Nev. 2022).

Opinion

1 DAYVID J. FIGLER, Nevada Bar No. 4264 LEO S. WOLPERT, Nevada Bar No. 12658 2) |MCLETCHIE LAW 602 South Tenth Street 3 | |Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 4 Telephone: (702) 728-5300; Fax: (702) 425-8220 Email: leo@nvlitigation.com 5 | |Counsel for Plaintiff Jason Mathis 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 | |JJASON MATHIS, an individual, Case. No.: 2:20-cv-02171-GMN-VCF ? Plaintiff, STIPULATED 10 PROTECTIVE ORDER vs. 1] KELLY B. QUINN an individual, PHONG 12 Q. HO, an individual, DOE = 13||CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS 1 — 5, individuals, 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff JASON MATHIS and Defendants KELLY B. QUINN and PHONG Q.

° HO by their respective counsel, having agreed to the following and for good cause under

8 Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 19 20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS. > Disclosure and discovery activity in this action may involve production of

9 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 53 disclosure may be warranted under Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all

35 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends to only the 6 limited information or items that are entitled under law to treatment as confidential.

7 2. SCOPE. 3g All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to discovery

1 | |requests, and all deposition testimony and exhibits and any other materials which may 2 | |be subject to discovery (hereinafter collectively “Discovery Material”) shall be subject to 3 | |this stipulated protective order concerning confidential information as set forth below. A 4 | |copy of this Order must be included with any subpoena to any third party. Any party, or 5 | Jany third party who produces documents in this litigation, may designate documents as 6 | |Confidential but only after review of the documents by an attorney who has, in good 7 | \faith, determined that the documents contain “Confidential Information,” as defined 8 | |below, and pursuant to the procedure set forth below. 9 3. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. 10 “Confidential Information” shall mean information meriting special protection 11] Junder the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and applicable case law. Confidential 12 | |Information does not include information that (a) is in the public domain at the time of 13 | |disclosure; (b) becomes part of the public domain through no fault of the Receiving Party; zen 14 | |(c) the Receiving Party can show was in its rightful and lawful possession at the time of 15 | |disclosure; or (d) the Receiving Party lawfully receives from a Non-party later without 16 | |restriction as to disclosure. 17 4. OTHER DEFINITIONS. 18 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, agents, and 19 | |attorney(s) of record for a Party in this action (including their associates, paralegals, and 20 | |support/ clerical staff). 21 Non-party: any individual, corporation, association, or natural person or entity 22 | jother than a party. 23 Protected Material: any Discovery Material containing Confidential Information 24 | |that is designated by a Party or Non-party as “CONFIDENTIAL,” unless the Receiving 25 | |Party challenges the confidentiality designation and (a) the Court decides such material is 26 | |not entitled to protection as confidential; (b) the Designating Party fails to apply the Court 27 | |for an order designating the material confidential within the time period specified below; or 28 | |(c) the Designating Party withdraws its confidentiality designation in writing.

] Producing Party: a Party or Non-party that produces Discovery Material in this 2 | action. 3 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-party that designates Discovery Material as 5 | |“CONFIDENTIAL”. The Party or Non-party designating information or items as Protected 6 | |Material bears the burden of establishing good cause for the confidentiality of all such items. 7 Challenging Party: a party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating 8 | |Party’s confidentiality designation. 9 Confidentiality Log: a Confidentiality Log must accompany any production of 10 | |documents designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” that includes the Bates numbers of the 11 | |documents designated (or the portions thereof) as “Confidential” and the basis for doing so. 12 | |Each Producing Party shall keep this log cumulatively and re-produce it every time they 13 | |designate something as “CONFIDENTIAL” so that it is a cumulative record of what the 14 | |party has marked “CONFIDENTIAL.” ge: 15 5. FORM AND TIMING OF DESIGNATION. 16 Protected Material shall be so designated by the Producing Party by placing or 17 | \affixing the word “CONFIDENTIAL” on the document in a manner which will not interfere 18 | |with the legibility of the document and which will permit complete removal of the 19 | |“Confidential” designation. A Confidentiality Log must accompany any production of 20 | |Protected Material that includes the Bates numbers of the documents designated (or portions 21 | |thereof) as “CONFIDENTIAL” and the basis for doing so. Documents shall be designated 22 | |“Confidential” prior to, or contemporaneously with, the production or disclosure of the 23 | |documents. The designation of documents as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be accompanied 24 | |with a Confidentiality Log in the form included at Exhibit A. 25 A Designating Party must exercise restraint and make good faith efforts to limit 26 | |CONFIDENTIAL designations to specific materials that qualify for protection under the 27 | |jappropriate standard. Further, a Designating Party must use good faith efforts to designate 28 | |for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or communications that

1 | |qualify—so that other portions of the materials, documents, items, or communications for 2 | |which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 3 | |If only a portion or portions of materials on a page or within a document merit protection, a 4 | |Producing Party must so indicate by making appropriate markings in the margins but not 5 | Jover text. The accompanying log should clearly explain which portion is designated as 6 | |CONFIDENTIAL. 7 A Producing Party that makes original documents or materials available for 8 | |inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 9 | |indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and 10 | |before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed 11 | |“Confidential.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and 12 | |produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, 13 | |qualify for protection under this Order, and, before producing the specified documents, the zen 14 | |Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend on each page that contains Protected ge: 15 | |Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the |Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 17 | |appropriated markings in the margins or by redacting protected portions). 18 Portions of depositions shall be designated CONFIDENTIAL when the deposition 19 | lis taken or within fourteen (14) business days after receipt of the transcript, if feasible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
FCA U.S. LLC v. Ctr. for Auto Safety
137 S. Ct. 38 (Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mathis v. Holguin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-holguin-nvd-2022.