Mathis v. Foote Steel Corp.

515 So. 2d 983, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 596, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2547, 1987 WL 21484
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 3, 1987
DocketNo. 70255
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 515 So. 2d 983 (Mathis v. Foote Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathis v. Foote Steel Corp., 515 So. 2d 983, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 596, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2547, 1987 WL 21484 (Fla. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district court of appeal in Mathis v. Foote Steel Corp., 502 So.2d 947 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), affirmed the dismissal of petitioners’ product liability action upon the authority of Pait v. Ford Motor Co., 500 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Because this Court had accepted jurisdiction to review Pait, we accepted jurisdiction on the petition for review filed in the instant case upon the authority of Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Based upon the rationale of Melendez v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co., 515 So.2d 735 (Fla.1987), we have now approved the decision in Pait v. Ford Motor Co., 515 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1987). Therefore, we also approve the decision of the district court of appeal in the instant case.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Felts v. State
537 So. 2d 995 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
515 So. 2d 983, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 596, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2547, 1987 WL 21484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-foote-steel-corp-fla-1987.