Mathis v. Experian Information Solutions

N.D. Texas

Mathis v. Experian Information Solutions

DecidedJune 14, 2021

Docket5:20-cv-00274

StatusUnknown

This text of Mathis v. Experian Information Solutions (Mathis v. Experian Information Solutions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mathis v. Experian Information Solutions, (N.D. Tex. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION KEVIN MATHIS, Plaintiff, V. No. 5:20-CV-274-H-BOQ EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, Defendant. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate D. Gordon Bryant made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) in this case on May 21, 2021. See Dkt. No. 9. Judge Bryant recommended that the Court dismiss the case without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Jd. No objections to the FCR were filed. The District Court has therefore reviewed the proposed FCR for plain error. U.S. ex rel. Steury v. Cardinal Health, Inc., 735 F.3d 202, 205 (Sth Cir. 2013) (“[P]lain error review applies when a party did not object to a magistrate judge’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, or recommendation to the district court, so long as the party was served with notice of the

consequences of failing to object.”) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Finding no error, plain or otherwise, the Court accepts the FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The plaintiffs claims against the defendant are dismissed without prejudice. The Court will enter a judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 in a separate document. So ordered on June 14. 202 Ac (O/he ee UNJTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION KEVIN MATHIS, Plaintiff, V. No. 5:20-CV-274-H-BOQ EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, Defendant. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate D. Gordon Bryant made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) in this case on May 21, 2021. See Dkt. No. 9. Judge Bryant recommended that the Court dismiss the case without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Jd. No objections to the FCR were filed. The District Court has therefore reviewed the proposed FCR for plain error. U.S. ex rel. Steury v. Cardinal Health, Inc., 735 F.3d 202, 205 (Sth Cir. 2013) (“[P]lain error review applies when a party did not object to a magistrate judge’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, or recommendation to the district court, so long as the party was served with notice of the

consequences of failing to object.”) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Finding no error, plain or otherwise, the Court accepts the FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The plaintiffs claims against the defendant are dismissed without prejudice. The Court will enter a judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 in a separate document. So ordered on June 14. 202 Ac (O/he ee UNJTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mathis v. Experian Information Solutions, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-experian-information-solutions-txnd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack