Mathis v. DFS
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
NATHAN MATHIS,1 § §
Respondent-Below, § No. 508, 2017 Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § in and for Kent County DIVISION OF FAMILY § SERVICES (DFS), § File No. 17-04-3TK § Petition No. 17-11609 Petitioner-Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: September 12, 2018 Decided: September 24, 2018
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and SEITZ, Justices.
ORDER
This 24th day of September, 2018, after careful consideration of the
parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final
judgment of the Family Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the
reasons stated in its October 30, 2017 order.
1 The Court previously assigned a pseudonym to the party under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the
Family Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.
Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathis v. DFS (Mathis v. DFS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.