Mathis v. DFS

Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided September 24, 2018·No. 508, 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

NATHAN MATHIS,1 § §

Respondent-Below, § No. 508, 2017 Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § in and for Kent County DIVISION OF FAMILY § SERVICES (DFS), § File No. 17-04-3TK § Petition No. 17-11609 Petitioner-Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: September 12, 2018 Decided: September 24, 2018

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and SEITZ, Justices.

ORDER

This 24th day of September, 2018, after careful consideration of the

parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final

judgment of the Family Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the

reasons stated in its October 30, 2017 order.

1 The Court previously assigned a pseudonym to the party under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the

Family Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathis v. DFS, (Del. 2018).

Mathis v. DFS (Mathis v. DFS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.